Key result
In SPF layer chickens, boosting with an inactivated IBV vaccine after live priming significantly increased protection against drops in egg production and reproductive organ abnormalities post-challenge.
Why the study?
An initial study showed heterologous virus neutralizing antibody responses following live priming and inactivated booster vaccination, prompting a more detailed evaluation of this vaccination programme in layer-type chickens.
Does priming with live IBV Mass and 793B vaccines followed by an inactivated IBV vaccine improve protection against virulent IBV challenge in SPF chickens?
Does priming with live IBV Mass and 793B vaccines followed by an inactivated IBV vaccine improve protection against virulent IBV challenge in SPF chickens?
A vaccination program using live-attenuated IBV priming followed by an inactivated vaccine boost provides broad-spectrum protection against multiple virulent IBV strains in chickens.
May inform IBV vaccination programs in poultry; leaves open field efficacy against variants in commercial flocks.
In an initial study in specified pathogen free (SPF) chickens, a heterologous virus neutralizing (VN) antibody response to IBV variants Q1, Variant 2 (Var 2), D388/QX (D388), D274 and Arkansas (DPI) was observed using a vaccination programme incorporating two different live-attenuated IBV vaccines, followed by boosting with an inactivated vaccine containing IBV Massachusetts (Mass) antigen. Therefore, a more detailed study was undertaken in SPF layer-type chickens primed with IBV Mass and 793B vaccines. The efficacy of single or repeated vaccination with a multivalent inactivated vaccine containing IBV antigen was determined against challenge with five virulent IBVs: Mass (M41), 793B (4/91), D388, Q1 and Var 2. The parameters assessed were serological response, respiratory signs, egg production, post mortem abnormalities in the reproductive organs and abdomen, and incidence of IBV antigen in kidneys. Increased VN titres were recorded against the five IBV challenge strains, with a significantly higher level of protection against drops in egg production following challenge. The difference between one or two vaccinations with inactivated vaccine was not significant in terms of egg production. However, a significantly increased level of protection was seen in the lower percentage of hens with free yolk in the abdomen and/or peritonitis post challenge with IBV variants, D388, Q1 and Var 2 not included in the vaccination programme. A lower incidence of acute, degenerated ovaries was found in groups given one injection of inactivated vaccine following live priming, and this was significantly lower than in groups given only live priming.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wit et al. (2018) studied Infectious Bronchitis Virus (IBV) infection. Multivalent inactivated vaccine containing IBV antigen vs. Live priming only was evaluated on Protection against drops in egg production and reproductive organ abnormalities. In SPF layer chickens, boosting with an inactivated IBV vaccine after live priming significantly increased protection against drops in egg production and reproductive organ abnormalities post-challenge.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: