Key result
Implantation of embolic protection devices during thrombolytic therapy with 50 mg Alteplase in a patient with obstructive prosthetic valve thrombosis resulted in successful thrombus resolution without stroke.
Why the study?
Cerebral thromboembolism risk is the main limitation of thrombolytic therapy for left-sided mechanical valve thrombosis, especially in high-surgical-risk patients.
Case Report (n=1)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Embolic protection devices may be safely used in conjunction with thrombolytic therapy to prevent cerebral embolization in high-risk patients with left-sided prosthetic valve thrombosis.
Background: Prosthetic valve thrombosis (PVT) is a rare but one of the most dreaded complications of implanted mechanical valves. Although surgery is the first-line treatment modality particularly in symptomatic obstructive mechanical valve thrombosis, it is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Thrombolytic therapy has also been used as an alternative to surgical treatment. The risk for cerebral thromboembolism associated with thrombolytic therapy seems to be the main limitation for its use in left-sided mechanical valve thrombosis. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of implantation of embolic protection devices during thrombolytic therapy of PVT. Case summary: Our report describes management of patient with obstructive PVT of the aortic valve. Fluoroscopy showed an immobile anterior disc of the aortic prosthesis. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) detected the severely restricted prosthetic valve motions and a huge mass at the supravalvular site. A patient had very high surgical risks. Although, thrombolytic treatment was not without risk due to the large thrombus (>10 mm) increasing the risk of thromboembolism. We implanted embolic protection devices into both internal carotid arteries followed by the administration of a thrombolytic therapy with 50 mg Alteplase. After the procedure an embolized thrombus was detected at the apex at the left-sided placed device. There were no signs of transient ischaemic attack nor stroke, and the procedure was ended uneventful. The TOE performed on the next day confirmed successful resolution of the thrombus. Discussion: Mechanical left-sided prosthetic valve obstruction is a serious complication with high mortality and morbidity and requires urgent therapy. The choice between surgery, thrombolysis, and escalation of anticoagulation is considered on an individual basis. In patients with high surgical risk and high risk of embolization, an embolic protection device may be used in conjunction with thrombolytic therapy to decrease the risk of embolic cerebral events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Osmonov et al. (2023) conducted a case report in Prosthetic valve thrombosis (n=1). Embolic protection device implantation and thrombolytic therapy was evaluated on Resolution of thrombus and prevention of cerebral thromboembolism. Implantation of embolic protection devices during thrombolytic therapy with 50 mg Alteplase in a patient with obstructive prosthetic valve thrombosis resulted in successful thrombus resolution without stroke.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: