Key result
Perioperative hyperoxia (FiO2>0.8) resulted in a 6.0% incidence of myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery compared to 10.4% with conventional therapy (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.26-1.14; P=0.945).
Why the study?
High perioperative FiO2 is recommended to reduce surgical site infections, but some studies suggest it may increase cardiovascular complications.
Does perioperative hyperoxia (FiO2 > 0.8) increase the incidence of myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery in intubated adults undergoing elective major colorectal surgery?
RCT (n=403)
Does perioperative hyperoxia (FiO2 > 0.8) increase the incidence of myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery in intubated adults undergoing elective major colorectal surgery?
Odds Ratio: 0.55 (95% CI 0.26–1.14)
Absolute Event Rate: 6% vs 10.4%
p-value: p=0.945
Perioperative hyperoxia (FiO2 > 0.8) does not increase the risk of myocardial injury or cardiovascular complications compared to conventional oxygen therapy in adults undergoing elective colorectal surgery.
High FiO2 does not increase MINS or MACCE in elective colorectal surgery; reinforces safety for SSI prevention in this population.
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization recommends hyperoxia (80% fraction of inspired oxygen, FiO2) during and for 2-6 hours following surgery to reduce surgical site infection (SSI). However, some studies suggest increased cardiovascular complications with such a high perioperative FiO2. The goal of our study was to compare the appearance of cardiovascular complications in elective adult colorectal surgery comparing the use of FiO2>0.8 versus conventional therapy (FiO2<0.4). METHODS: We performed a randomized controlled trial in intubated patients undergoing elective major colorectal surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to receive perioperative FiO2>0.8 or FiO2<0.4. The primary outcome, expressed as Odds Ratio (OR) ±95% Confidence Interval (95%CI), was the incidence of MINS (myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery evaluated for the first 4 postoperative days). Secondary outcomes included MACCE (major adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events) up to 30 postoperative days, SSI, other postoperative complications (according to Clavien-Dindo classification) and length of stay. RESULTS: We included in the final analyses 403 patients. Comparing the FiO2>0.8 and FiO2<0.4 groups, there was no difference in the appearance of MINS (6.0% vs. 10.4%; OR 0.55; 95% CI: 0.26-1.14; P=0.945). There were no differences between the groups for important secondary outcomes including MACCE to 30 days, SSI, postoperative complications or length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative hyperoxia therapy (FiO2>0.8) with the aim of decreasing SSI did not increase cardiovascular complications after elective colorectal surgery in a general population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sadurní et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Elective adult colorectal surgery (n=403). Perioperative hyperoxia vs. Conventional therapy (FiO2<0.4) was evaluated on Incidence of MINS (myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery evaluated for the first 4 postoperative days) (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.26-1.14, p=0.945). Perioperative hyperoxia (FiO2>0.8) resulted in a 6.0% incidence of myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery compared to 10.4% with conventional therapy (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.26-1.14; P=0.945).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: