Why the study?
Enhanced recovery principles and multimodal perioperative support in operative gynecology require comprehensive study and optimization due to ambiguous literature reports.
Does an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol improve perioperative recovery parameters in reproductive age patients undergoing hysterectomy for uterine leiomyoma?
Cohort (n=160)
Does an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol improve perioperative recovery parameters in reproductive age patients undergoing hysterectomy for uterine leiomyoma?
The implementation of ERAS protocols in reproductive age patients undergoing hysterectomy significantly accelerates postoperative recovery and improves early clinical outcomes.
May support ERAS for shorter hysterectomy stays; leaves open randomized confirmation before practice change.
Background and aims. The principles of enhanced recovery in operative gynecology, comorbidity, and a multimodal approach in perioperative support require comprehensive study and optimization, and the ambiguity of literature reports determines the relevance of this study. The aim of this study was to evaluate the parameters of perioperative monitoring after hysterectomy for uterine leiomyoma in patients of reproductive age using enhanced recovery after surgery protocols and their impact on quality of life indicators. Materials and methods. To evaluate the effectiveness of the enhanced recovery protocol after hysterectomy, two groups were formed: the main prospective group, which included 46 patients, who underwent vaginal hysterectomy without appendages and 36 patients with abdominal hysterectomy, who used enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols. The comparison group (group of standard management) included 44 patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy without appendages and 34 patients with abdominal hysterectomy. The main parameters of monitoring were the postoperative pain level, intraoperative blood loss, diuresis rate, the timing of urinary catheter removal and recovery of peristalsis, as well as individual activation of motor activity. Results. When using the principles of ERAS, the quantitative assessment of pain level (“absence of pain”) was 1.6 times more severe compared to the data of the comparison group; the timing of urinary catheter removal was 2.0 times shorter, drain removal – 2.7 times shorter, recovery of peristalsis – 1.9 times shorter and individual activation of motor activity – 2.9 times earlier than in patients of the comparison group. Conclusions. Studies have demonstrated the feasibility of using laparoscopic technology in combination with the ERAS, which demonstrates a fall in the volume of intraoperative blood loss, a decrease in blood and fluid balance, a shortening of the time of invasive intravascular intervention, allows to improve the course of the early postoperative period, relieve postoperative pain syndrome, reduce the risk of intestinal paresis, shorten the rehabilitation period, and, as a result, improve quality of life indicators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Proshchenko et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Uterine leiomyoma (n=160). Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols vs. Standard management was evaluated on Hospital stay (days) (p=<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: