Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We report that antiferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic (AF-AF) alternating Heisenberg chains with S =1/2 are formed in (CH 3 ) 2 CHNH 3 CuBr 3 , which is in contrast to the almost isomorphous compound (CH 3 ) 2 CHNH 3 CuCl 3 , because the Cl compound forms ferromagnetic-dominant ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic (F-AF) alternating Heisenberg chains [H. Manaka et al. : J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 66 (1997) 564]. From the analysis of the dependence of magnetic susceptibility on temperature, χ( T ), the two different antiferromagnetic exchange interactions defined in the Hamiltonian H = -2 J 1 ∑ S 2 i · S 2 i +1 -2 J 2 ∑ S 2 i · S 2 i -1 are determined to be J 1 / k =-61 K and J 2 / k =-33 K. Applying the low temperature experimental data to the formula χ( T )∝ T -1/2 exp (-Δ/ k T ), we estimate the energy gap Δ to be 98 K. We discuss why AF-AF and F-AF alternating chains are formed in the Br and the Cl compounds, respectively, in spite of their almost isomorphous crystal structures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manaka et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: