Key result
Negative pre-transplant pp65-specific ELISPOT assay results independently predicted an increased risk of developing CMV infections after kidney transplantation (adjusted HR 1.87).
Why the study?
Does a negative pre-transplant CMV-specific ELISPOT assay predict the development of CMV infections in adult living-donor kidney transplant recipients?
Cohort (n=133)
Single-blind
No
Does a negative pre-transplant CMV-specific ELISPOT assay predict the development of CMV infections in adult living-donor kidney transplant recipients?
Hazard Ratio: 1.87 (95% CI 1.01–3.46)
Absolute Event Rate: 47% vs 28%
p-value: p=0.047
A negative pre-transplant CMV-specific ELISPOT assay independently predicts an increased risk of CMV infection after living-donor kidney transplantation.
Negative pre-transplant pp65 ELISPOT identifies higher post-KT CMV risk; leaves open whether assay-guided prophylaxis improves outcomes.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: We evaluated the usefulness in kidney transplant (KT) candidates of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assays for predicting the development of post-transplant CMV infections. METHODS: All adult recipients admitted for living-donor KT between March 2014 and March 2015 were prospectively enrolled except donor CMV-seropositive and recipient seronegative (D+/R-) recipients. All the enrolled patients underwent CMV-specific ELISPOT assays before transplant, and a researcher blinded to the results of these assays examined the patients for CMV infection at least 6 months post-transplant. RESULTS: Of 133 KT recipients, 44 (33%) developed CMV infections. When we used the cut-off determined by receiver operator characteristic curve, 16 of the 34 patients (47%) with negative pp65-specific ELISPOT results (< 11 spots/200,000 cells) developed CMV infections, whereas 28 of the 99 patients (39%) with positive pp65-specific ELISPOT results at baseline (≥ 11 spots/200,000 cells) developed CMV infections after KT (p = 0.02). Based on the multivariable Cox regression model, negative pp65-specific ELISPOT assay results was an independent risk factor for CMV infection (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01 to 3.46; p = 0.047) as well as age (AHR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.08; p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: Pre-transplant CMV-specific ELISPOT assay appears to predict the development of CMV infections after KT in recipients at moderate risk such as CMV-seropositive recipients (Clinical Trial Registration Number NCT02025335).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (n=133). Negative pre-transplant pp65-specific ELISPOT assay (< 11 spots/200,000 cells) vs. Positive pp65-specific ELISPOT assay (≥ 11 spots/200,000 cells) was evaluated on Development of CMV infection (AHR 1.87, 95% CI 1.01 to 3.46, p=0.047). Negative pre-transplant pp65-specific ELISPOT assay results independently predicted an increased risk of developing CMV infections after kidney transplantation (adjusted HR 1.87).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: