Key result
An algorithm estimating cardiac output from right ventricular pressure waveforms strongly correlated with Fick measurements (R2 = 0.92) in patients with congestive heart failure.
Why the study?
Does a pulse contour cardiac output algorithm using right ventricular pressure waveforms accurately estimate cardiac output compared to the Fick method in patients with congestive heart failure?
Observational (n=16)
Yes
Does a pulse contour cardiac output algorithm using right ventricular pressure waveforms accurately estimate cardiac output compared to the Fick method in patients with congestive heart failure?
Continuous analysis of right ventricular pressure waveforms from an implantable hemodynamic monitor can accurately estimate cardiac output at rest and during exercise in patients with heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support continuous CO estimation via RV waveforms in HF; hypothesis-generating pending outcome trials.
BACKGROUND: Cardiac output (CO) is an important determinant of the hemodynamic state in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). We tested the hypothesis that CO can be estimated from the right ventricular (RV) pressure waveform in CHF patients using a pulse contour cardiac output algorithm that considers constant but patient specific RV outflow tract characteristic impedance. METHOD: In 12 patients with CHF, breath-by-breath Fick CO and RV pressure waveforms were recorded utilizing an implantable hemodynamic monitor during a bicycle exercise protocol. These data were analyzed retrospectively to assess changes in characteristic impedance of the RV outflow tract during exercise. Four patients that were implanted with an implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) implementing the algorithm were studied prospectively. During a two staged sub-maximal bicycle exercise test conducted at 4 and 16 weeks of implant, COs measured by direct Fick technique and estimated by the ICD were recorded and compared. RESULTS: At rest the total pulmonary arterial resistance and the characteristic impedance were 675 ± 345 and 48 ± 18 dyn.s.cm(-5), respectively. During sub-maximal exercise, the total pulmonary arterial resistance decreased (Δ 91 ± 159 dyn.s.cm(-5), p < 0.05) but the characteristic impedance was unaffected (Δ 3 ± 9 dyn.s.cm(-5), NS). The algorithm derived cardiac output estimates correlated with Fick CO (7.6 ± 2.5 L/min, R(2) = 0.92) with a limit of agreement of 1.7 L/min and tracked changes in Fick CO (R(2) = 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: The analysis of right ventricular pressure waveforms continuously recorded by an implantable hemodynamic monitor provides an estimate of CO and may prove useful in guiding treatment in patients with CHF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karamanoglu et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Congestive heart failure (n=16). Pulse contour cardiac output (PCCO) algorithm vs. Fick cardiac output measurement was evaluated on Correlation between estimated and measured cardiac output (R2 = 0.92, p=<0.001). An algorithm estimating cardiac output from right ventricular pressure waveforms strongly correlated with Fick measurements (R2 = 0.92) in patients with congestive heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: