Key result
RVP-derived cardiac output correlates poorly with echocardiography during VV ECMO, overestimating flow by ~1.9 L/min.
Why the study?
Does right ventricular pressure-derived cardiac output (CO RV) accurately reflect cardiac output measured by echocardiography (CO US) during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) in a porcine model?
Does right ventricular pressure-derived cardiac output (CO RV) accurately reflect cardiac output measured by echocardiography (CO US) during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) in a porcine model?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Right ventricular pressure-derived cardiac output monitoring via a Swan-Ganz IQ catheter is unreliable for estimating cardiac output during VV ECMO in a porcine model.
Cardiac output (CO) monitoring is challenging during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO), as thermodilution techniques are unreliable. Cardiac output from right ventricular pressure (RVP) waveforms has recently been considered. We evaluated whether RVP-derived CO (CO RV ) accurately reflects cardiac output measured by echocardiography (CO US ) during VV ECMO. Ten anesthetized pigs underwent femoro-jugular VV ECMO implantation. A Swan-Ganz IQ catheter provided continuous CO RV monitoring throughout the experiment. Cardiac output was modulated using either dobutamine (5–20 µg/kg/min) or landiolol (10–40 µg/kg/min) infusions. Agreement between CO RV and CO US was assessed using Pearson correlation and Bland–Altman analysis. Overall, 596 paired CO measurements were performed in seven animals. Cardiac output ranged from 1.05 to 9.46 L/min. Correlation between CO RV and CO US was poor ( R = 0.24; R 2 = 0.057; p < 0.05). Bland–Altman analysis showed a mean bias of +1.94 L/min with wide limits of agreement (−1.44 to +5.32 L/min). Correlations between individual right ventricular pressure waveform components and CO US were heterogeneous and weak to moderate (diastolic RVP, R = 0.36; right ventricle +d P /d t [delta pressure/delta time] R = 0.40; systolic RVP R = 0.60). CO RV is not reliable during VV ECMO in our experiment. Further studies are needed to assess CO RV performances.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lescroart et al. (2026) studied Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) (n=10). Right ventricular pressure-derived cardiac output (CO RV) monitoring via Swan-Ganz IQ catheter vs. Echocardiography-measured cardiac output (CO US) was evaluated on Agreement and correlation between RVP-derived cardiac output (CO RV) and echocardiography-measured cardiac output (CO US) (R = 0.24; mean bias +1.94 L/min, p=<0.05). RVP-derived cardiac output showed poor correlation (R=0.24, p<0.05) and wide limits of agreement (bias +1.94 L/min) compared with echocardiography during VV ECMO.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: