Genomic study finds minimal genetic correlation between reproductive traits and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer in Europeans, indicating limited life-history trade-offs.
Estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer (ER+ BC) is one of the most prevalent cancers, but the evolutionary processes shaping genetic variation in ER+ BC risk are poorly understood. Both evolutionary life-history theory and evidence from studies of individual ER+ BC risk variants suggest that increased genetic ER+ BC risk is associated with faster maturation, earlier reproduction, and/or increased reproductive success (i.e., there is a trade-off), but it is unclear how well this pattern is replicated when considering the polygenic architecture of these traits after controlling for potential biases. Here, we estimate genome-wide genetic correlations between ER+ BC risk and three reproductive traits (age at menarche, age at first birth, and the number of children) using genomic restricted maximum-likelihood analyses on Lifelines biobank data and linkage disequilibrium score regressions on population and family-based genome-wide association study data. Regardless of the data or method used, genetic correlations were low and not statistically significant. Further analyses decomposing genome-wide genetic variance into local regions detected only three loci exhibiting significant pleiotropy between ER+ BC risk and age at menarche, suggesting little shared genetic architecture between ER+ BC risk and reproductive traits. Thus, the role of life-history trade-offs in shaping ER+ BC risk in European populations appears, at most, small, and the evolutionary processes giving rise to this life-threatening disease remain unclear. Future studies could examine the impact of evolutionary mismatches in shaping ER+ BC risk, where conducting longitudinal studies on populations transitioning to reproductive patterns observed in contemporary European populations would be most useful.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Young et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: