Experimental study reveals fluid-specific displacement dynamics across distinct pore structures in low-permeability sandstone, highlighting optimal enhanced oil recovery strategies.
Low-permeability sandstone reservoirs are characterized by fine pore-throat structures and strong heterogeneity, leading to complex multiphase flow behavior; since relative permeability curves are highly sensitive to displacement media, they serve as critical parameters for EOR performance and development optimization, yet the coupling between the pore-throat structure and the displacement fluid type remains poorly quantified. This study investigates low-permeability sandstone cores from the strike-slip fault block of the Laojunmiao Oilfield. Based on a petrophysical analysis and a high-pressure mercury intrusion, the cores are classified into four types (X1: medium pores, high permeability; X2: micropores, low permeability; X3: fine pores, relatively homogeneous; X4: fine pores with locally dominant channels), and unsteady-state relative permeability experiments are conducted under water, polymer, and nitrogen flooding. A comprehensive structural index (SI) is proposed to characterize the pore-throat structure and its correlation with the width of the two-phase flow zone. The results show that the pore-throat structure fundamentally governs the water flooding behavior, with Type X2 cores prone to preferential channeling; polymer flooding improves the mobility ratio most prominently in Type X1 and X3 cores; and nitrogen flooding performs best in Type X2 cores by retarding gas fingering. The two-phase flow zone width correlates linearly with the structural parameters, with polymer flooding showing the greatest sensitivity to structural variation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: