What question did this study set out to answer?

To compare perioperative complications and short- and long-term clinical outcomes between hybrid coronary revascularization and traditional coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease.

March 28, 2022The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery

Hybrid revascularization vs. coronary bypass for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

To compare perioperative complications and short- and long-term clinical outcomes between hybrid coronary revascularization and traditional coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease.
Conducted a PRISMA-guided systematic review across PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS comparing single- or two-stage hybrid coronary revascularization with conventional coronary artery bypass grafting.
Included 22 studies comprising a total of 6,981 participants.
Hybrid coronary revascularization was associated with significantly reduced operative time, bleeding, ventilator duration, hospital length of stay, and lower odds of blood transfusions and in-hospital myocardial infarction.
Rates of in-hospital mortality, all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac events, stroke, reintervention, and complete revascularization showed no statistically significant differences between the two strategies.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Systematic review and meta-analysis shows reduced perioperative morbidity with hybrid revascularization in coronary artery disease, indicating it is a feasible alternative to standard bypass.

Cite This Study

Hinojosa-González et al. (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a97ebec7f1bd40ee0e3501b https://doi.org/10.23736/s0021-9509.22.12163-4

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Systematic review and meta-analysis shows reduced perioperative morbidity with hybrid revascularization in coronary artery disease, indicating it is a feasible alternative to standard bypass.

Hybrid revascularization vs. coronary bypass for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Hybrid revascularization vs. coronary bypass for coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider