Key result
Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting showed a 30-day mortality benefit in 3 of 9 studies (n=3,001) compared to on-pump surgery, but was associated with less complete revascularization.
Why the study?
Does off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) grafting improve mortality compared to on-pump surgery (ONCAB) in patients with acute coronary syndrome requiring emergency revascularization?
Systematic Review (n=3,001)
Does off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) grafting improve mortality compared to on-pump surgery (ONCAB) in patients with acute coronary syndrome requiring emergency revascularization?
OPCAB may offer a 30-day mortality benefit in hemodynamically stable patients with ACS requiring emergency revascularization, though it is associated with less complete revascularization and lacks high-quality evidence.
May favor OPCAB for 30-day survival in select ACS cases; leaves open long-term impact of incomplete revascularization amid inconsistent evidence.
A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) grafting should be considered as an alternative to the conventional on-pump surgery (ONCAB) in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) requiring emergency revascularization. Eighty-two papers were identified by a systematic search, of which nine were judged to best answer the clinical question. Of these, one was a randomized controlled trial and the remaining eight were retrospective observational studies. The author, journal, date, patient group, country of publication, relevant outcomes, results and study weaknesses were tabulated. In total, these nine studies included 3001 patients (n = 817 OPCAB, 2184 ONCAB) undergoing emergency revascularization in the setting of ACS. The timing between the onset of ACS and operative intervention ranged from 6 to 72 h. All cases were categorized as urgent/emergent according to the National confidential enquiry into patient outcome and death classification of intervention. Six studies included patients with preoperative cardiogenic shock; however the majority of patients were haemodynamically stable at the time of surgery. Three out of nine studies showed an improvement in 30-day mortality with OPCAB although the remaining six reveal no significant mortality benefit. No difference in long-term mortality was observed between the two techniques. OPCAB was associated with significantly fewer grafts per patient (six studies) and less complete revascularization (two studies). We conclude that whilst OPCAB may have a beneficial effect on 30-day mortality in haemodynamically stable patients undergoing emergency revascularization, there is a lack of high-quality data with clearly defined patient demographics. Future studies must ensure adequate preoperative matching between OPCAB and ONCAB groups and clearly categorize haemodynamic status, disease pattern and time to surgery in order to determine the patients in whom OPCAB may confer the greatest benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moscarelli et al. (2012) conducted a systematic review in Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) requiring emergency revascularization (n=3,001). Off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) grafting vs. Conventional on-pump surgery (ONCAB) was evaluated on 30-day mortality. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting showed a 30-day mortality benefit in 3 of 9 studies (n=3,001) compared to on-pump surgery, but was associated with less complete revascularization.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: