Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We previously observed T-bet(+) lymphocytes to be associated with a good prognosis in a cohort of women with familial breast cancer. To validate this finding, we evaluated lymphocyte T-bet expression in an independent unselected prospectively accrued series of women with lymph node-negative breast carcinoma. T-bet and clinicopathologic data were available for 614 women. Hormone receptors, HER2, Ki-67, CK5, EGFR, p53, and T-bet status were determined using IHC and/or biochemical methods. Tumors were assigned to luminal A, luminal B, HER2, and basal subtypes based on the expression of IHC markers. Multiple cutpoints were examined in a univariate penalized Cox model to stratify tumors into T-bet(+/high) and T-bet(-/low). Fisher exact test was used to analyze T-bet associations with clinicopathologic variables, IHC markers, and molecular subtype. Survival analyses were by the Cox proportional hazards model. All tests were two sided. A test with a P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. T-bet(+/high) tumor status was significantly associated with large tumor size, high grade, hormone receptor negativity, CK5, EGFR and p53 positivity, high Ki-67, and basal subtype. With a median follow-up of 96.5 months, T-bet(-/low) tumor status was associated with a reduced disease-free survival compared with T-bet(+/high) tumor status in multivariate analysis (P = 0.0027; relative risk = 5.62; 95% confidence intervals, 1.48-50.19). Despite being associated with adverse clinicopathologic characteristics, T-bet(+) tumor-infiltrating lymphoid cells are associated with a favorable outcome. This supports their role in Th1-mediated antitumor activity and may provide insight for the development of new therapeutic strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mulligan et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: