Key result
Elevated baseline HADS scores of 5-7 strongly predicted new onset anxiety (HR 5.97; 95% CI 3.77-9.45) and depression (HR 6.45; 95% CI 4.12-10.10) in first-time ICD patients over 24 months.
Why the study?
The cumulative incidence of and covariates associated with new onset anxiety and depression during follow-up in ICD patients without baseline depression and anxiety remained to be examined.
What is the incidence and what are the predictors of new onset anxiety and depression in patients receiving a first-time ICD?
Observational (n=1,040)
Yes
What is the incidence and what are the predictors of new onset anxiety and depression in patients receiving a first-time ICD?
Hazard Ratio: 5.97 (95% CI 3.77–9.45)
A significant proportion of patients receiving a first-time ICD develop new-onset anxiety (14.5%) and depression (11.3%) within 24 months, with minimally elevated baseline HADS scores strongly predicting these outcomes.
May warrant serial HADS screening in ICD patients; leaves open whether early intervention prevents new-onset anxiety or depression.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the cumulative incidence of and covariates' association with new onset anxiety and depression in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients during 24 months of follow-up in patients without depression and anxiety at implant. METHODS: Patients (n = 1040; 155 (14.9%) women; mean age: 64.2 ± 10.6) with a first-time ICD enrolled in the national, multi-center prospective observational DEFIB-WOMEN study comprised the study cohort. We obtained information on demographic and clinical data from the Danish Pacemaker and ICD Register. RESULTS: During 24 months of follow-up, 138 (14.5%) patients developed new onset anxiety and 109 (11.3%) new onset depression. Age ≥ 60 [HR:0.60;95%CI:0.40-0.90] and an anxiety score between 3 and 4 [HR:2.85; 95%CI:1.71-4.75] and 5-7 [HR:5.97; 95%CI:3.77-9.45] on the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) were associated with different hazards of new onset anxiety during follow-up. Age ≥ 60 [HR:0.62;95%CI:0.42-0.93] and a HADS depression score between 3 and 4 [HR:2.99;95%CI:1.80-4.95] and 5-7 [HR:6.45; 95%CI:4.12-10.10] were associated with different hazards of new onset depression. CONCLUSION: During 24 months of follow-up, respectively 14.5% and 11.3% of patients developed new onset anxiety and depression, suggesting that screening patients at several timepoints, and in particular those with even minimally elevated HADS scores at baseline, may be warranted to identify patients at risk for poor health outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pedersen et al. (2021) conducted an observational in First-time implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) (n=1,040). Elevated baseline Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score (5-7) vs. Lower baseline HADS score was evaluated on New onset anxiety (HR 5.97, 95% CI 3.77-9.45). Elevated baseline HADS scores of 5-7 strongly predicted new onset anxiety (HR 5.97; 95% CI 3.77-9.45) and depression (HR 6.45; 95% CI 4.12-10.10) in first-time ICD patients over 24 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: