Key result
Multidisciplinary educational meetings significantly improved patients' understanding of coronary artery function from 81% at baseline to 99% post-intervention.
Why the study?
Do multidisciplinary educational meetings improve knowledge about cardiovascular pathology and risk factors in patients admitted for cardiovascular rehabilitation?
Population
124 patients and 93 patients admitted for cardiovascular rehabilitation. Group 1: mean age 70, 73% male…
Comparison
Periodical multidisciplinary educational… vs Baseline knowledge before the educational…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
Immediate (at the end of the meeting or at discharge)
Authors
Loading...
May support CAD education programs; leaves open effects on adherence or outcomes.
Observational (n=124)
No
Do multidisciplinary educational meetings improve knowledge about cardiovascular pathology and risk factors in patients admitted for cardiovascular rehabilitation?
Absolute Event Rate: 99% vs 81%
p-value: p=0.001
Multidisciplinary educational meetings during cardiovascular rehabilitation significantly improve patients' immediate knowledge of their disease, treatments, and risk factors, regardless of age.
Giobergia et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Cardiovascular disease undergoing rehabilitation (n=124). Multidisciplinary educational meetings vs. Pre-intervention baseline was evaluated on Knowledge of coronary artery function (Questionnaire 1, Question 1) (p=0.001). Multidisciplinary educational meetings significantly improved patients' understanding of coronary artery function from 81% at baseline to 99% post-intervention.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: