Key result
Permanent pacemaker placement in a patient with persistent left superior vena cava was successfully achieved using a long 8.5 Fr deflectable sheath to navigate the anatomical challenges.
Case Report (n=1)
No
Anatomic challenges of pacemaker placement in patients with persistent left superior vena cava can be overcome using long deflectable sheaths to navigate the coronary sinus.
May facilitate lead placement in persistent left SVC; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) is a rare disorder which is asymptomatic and hence is usually discovered while performing interventions through the left subclavian vein. We present a case of a 78-year-old male who was undergoing elective placement of a permanent pacemaker for tachycardia - bradycardia syndrome with post-conversion pauses of up to nine seconds. After achieving access through the left subclavian vein the wire kept on going on the left side of the chest instead of crossing the midline to the right side. The wire was removed and contrast venography was done, PLSVC with dilated coronary sinus emptying into the right atrium was confirmed. There was some difficulty in passing the lead to the right ventricle even with the acute curve in the stylet. The sheath size was increased and a longer deflectable sheath was used and with the tip of the lead anteriorly the right ventricle was cannulated and the lead was affixed. There were good sensing and pacing parameters. Post procedure chest x-ray was done and the patient was discharged without any complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sundhu et al. (2017) conducted a case report in Tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome with persistent left superior vena cava (n=1). Pacemaker placement using a long deflectable sheath was evaluated on Successful pacemaker placement. Permanent pacemaker placement in a patient with persistent left superior vena cava was successfully achieved using a long 8.5 Fr deflectable sheath to navigate the anatomical challenges.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: