Key result
Heart rate variability (SDNN) independently predicted unfavorable functional outcome in men, whereas insular damage predicted unfavorable outcome in women.
Why the study?
Do gender-specific factors like heart rate variability and insular damage predict functional outcome in subacute ischemic stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation?
Cohort (n=126)
Do gender-specific factors like heart rate variability and insular damage predict functional outcome in subacute ischemic stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation?
Heart rate variability predicts functional outcome after stroke rehabilitation in men, whereas insular damage predicts outcome in women, highlighting gender-specific prognostic factors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform sex-stratified prognosis after subacute stroke; extends observational data but should not yet change practice.
The aim of this study was to assess the impact of cardiac autonomic derangement on gender-associated functional outcome of patients with subacute ischemic stroke undergoing a hospital-based rehabilitation program. The study population included 126 consecutive first-ever stroke survivors (mean age 59.7 +/- 11.6 years). Time-domain measures of heart rate variability (HRV) by 24-hour Holter monitoring (HM) were considered in all cases. By the end of the rehabilitation program an unfavorable functional outcome with dependency (Barthel Index score of <75) was found in 27 men (40.3%) and in 31 women (52.5%; p = 0.168). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that high age, low Barthel Index score and low Rankin Scale score on admission were independent predictors of an unfavorable functional outcome in both men and women. The standard deviation of normal-to-normal RR intervals on HM was an independent predictor of rehabilitation outcome only in men (OR 15.29, 95% CI 2.47-46.58, p = 0.001). The presence of insular damage on neuroimaging studies was independently associated with an unfavorable functional outcome only in female (OR 18.89, 95% CI 2.34-71.4, p = 0.006). HRV does not predict functional outcome after rehabilitation in women. Instead, insular damage appears to have a role in determining the final results of rehabilitation in women but not in men.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bassi et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Subacute ischemic stroke (n=126). Cardiac autonomic derangement (HRV) and insular damage vs. Normal HRV / no insular damage was evaluated on Unfavorable functional outcome with dependency (Barthel Index score <75) (OR 15.29, 95% CI 2.47-46.58, p=0.001). Heart rate variability (SDNN) independently predicted unfavorable functional outcome in men, whereas insular damage predicted unfavorable outcome in women.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: