Key result
3-D neighborhood aggregation ML improves arrhythmogenic region identification to ~93% sensitivity.
Why the study?
Identifying arrhythmia-driving regions from electroanatomical 3-D mapping to guide ablation for scar-related VT remains challenging and operator-dependent.
Does a machine-learning pipeline incorporating 3-D neighborhood aggregation improve the identification of arrhythmia-driving regions in patients with ventricular tachycardia?
Observational (n=14)
Does a machine-learning pipeline incorporating 3-D neighborhood aggregation improve the identification of arrhythmia-driving regions in patients with ventricular tachycardia?
Absolute Event Rate: 92.6% vs 62.1%
Incorporating explicit 3-D neighborhood context into machine-learning models improves the discrimination of arrhythmogenic regions in ventricular tachycardia, potentially aiding in the prioritization of ablation targets.
Electroanatomical 3-D mapping provides bipolar electrograms (EGMs) to guide ablation for scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, identifying arrhythmia-driving regions remains challenging and operator-dependent. We propose and evaluate a supervised machine-learning pipeline that combines point-wise EGM features with explicit 3-D neighborhood aggregation to prioritize potential ablation target regions. We retrospectively analyzed 86,765 bipolar EGMs from 14 VT patients and constructed a curated dataset of 16,078 EGMs, including 1,729 EGMs from clinically defined arrhythmogenic (ARR) regions. We compared three feature sets: point-wise baseline features (FS 1), baseline plus 5-mm neighborhood aggregation (FS 2), and a compact feature subset (FS 3). Three classifiers (sup- port vector machine, k-nearest neighbors, and bagged trees) were evaluated using repeated stratified cross-validation on the curated dataset and leave-one-patient-out (LOPO) full-map validation. In repeated cross-validation, the best FS 1 model achieved 62.1% sensitivity, 98.8% specificity, and 92.8% accuracy. Using FS 2 improved performance to 92.6% sensitivity, 99.6% specificity, and 98.5% accuracy. In LOPO full-map validation, specificity remained high (97.5%), whereas sensitivity decreased under realistic class imbalance. These results suggest that explicit 3-D neighborhood context improves the discrimination between ARR and NON-ARR regions and may support prioritizing potential ablation target regions in VT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masjedi et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Ventricular tachycardia (n=14). Machine-learning pipeline with 3-D neighborhood aggregation (FS 2) vs. Point-wise baseline features (FS 1) was evaluated on Sensitivity for identifying arrhythmogenic regions. A machine-learning pipeline using explicit 3-D neighborhood aggregation improved the identification of arrhythmogenic regions compared to baseline features, achieving 92.6% sensitivity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: