Key result
Electrogram-based machine learning localizes LV tachycardia exit sites to within ~2.8 cm.
Why the study?
Does a machine learning system using ICD-EGM features improve the identification of the left ventricular tachycardia exit site anatomical region?
Does a machine learning system using ICD-EGM features improve the identification of the left ventricular tachycardia exit site anatomical region?
A machine learning system using ICD-EGM features can estimate the left ventricular tachycardia exit site with a spatial resolution of about 3 cm, potentially supporting faster ablation procedures when 12-lead ECGs are unavailable.
Electrograms stored in Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators (ICD-EGM) have been proven to convey useful information for roughly determining the anatomical location of the Left Ventricular Tachycardia exit site (LVTES). Our aim here was to evaluate the possibilities from a machine learning system intended to provide an estimation of the LVTES anatomical region with the use of ICD-EGM in the situation where 12-lead electrocardiogram of ventricular tachycardia are not available. Several machine learning techniques were specifically designed and benchmarked, both from classification (such as Neural Networks (NN), and Support Vector Machines (SVM)) and regression (Kernel Ridge Regression) problem statements. Classifiers were evaluated by using accuracy rates for LVTES identification in a controlled number of anatomical regions, and the regression approach quality was studied in terms of the spatial resolution. We analyzed the ICD-EGM of 23 patients (18±10 EGM per patient) during left ventricular pacing and simultaneous recording of the spatial coordinates of the pacing electrode with a navigation system. Several feature sets extracted from ICD-EGM (consisting of times and voltages) were shown to convey more discriminative information than the raw waveform. Among classifiers, the SVM performed slightly better than NN. In accordance with previous clinical works, the average spatial resolution for the LVTES was about 3 cm, as in our system, which allows it to support the faster determination of the LVTES in ablation procedures. The proposed approach also provides with a framework suitable for driving the design of improved performance future systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sanromán‐Junquera et al. (2015) studied Ventricular Tachycardia (n=23). Machine learning system using ICD-EGM features was evaluated on Spatial resolution (Euclidean distance between actual and estimated spatial coordinates). A machine learning system using specific electrogram features achieved an average spatial resolution of 2.84 cm for identifying the left ventricular tachycardia exit site.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: