Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
INTRODUCTION: Immunosuppressed individuals are at increased risk of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). Although mRNA vaccines have shown efficacy in these populations, data on protein-based vaccines remain limited. We evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of Novavax COVID-19 vaccine (NVX-CoV2601) in immunosuppressed patients. METHODS: This single-center, prospective ARMOR study included adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or solid organ transplant recipients receiving immunosuppressive therapy who had received ≥3 prior COVID-19 vaccine doses. Participants received one NVX-CoV2601 booster with follow-up at one and six months. The primary outcome was change in humoral immunogenicity from baseline to one month post-vaccination. RESULTS: Twenty-one immunosuppressed patients (18 IBD, 3 solid organ transplant recipients) were enrolled and compared with 57 age/sex-matched healthy controls. In ARMOR participants, anti-spike IgG GMT increased significantly post-immunization (22,969 to 66,639 EU/mL; 2.9-fold increase, p = 0.001). Healthy controls increased from 54,812 to 129,813 EU/mL (2.4-fold increase; p < 0.001). After baseline adjustment, no significant difference existed between groups at day 28. At 6 months, antibodies waned faster in immunosuppressed subjects. NVX-CoV2601 was well tolerated without IBD flares or organ rejection. CONCLUSION: NVX-CoV2601 was safe and immunogenic with similar humoral responses compared to healthy controls, making it a viable alternative for immunosuppressed patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vattoth et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: