Key result
Sacubitril/valsartan significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction (39% vs 34%, P<0.05) and attenuated progressive left ventricular dilation compared to vehicle in rats with heart failure post-myocardial infarction.
Why the study?
ARNi therapy improves prognosis in heart failure patients, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear.
Does sacubitril/valsartan improve myocardial remodeling and cardiac perfusion in a rat model of heart failure post-MI compared to valsartan or vehicle?
Population
10-weeks old male Lewis rats with confirmed HF after MI
Comparison
Sacubitril/valsartan vs valsartan vs vehicle
Design
Randomized preclinical study
Follow-up
1 or 5 weeks
Authors
Loading...
Preclinical rat data should not yet change practice; leaves open whether sacubitril/valsartan benefits exceed valsartan in human post-MI remodeling.
Does sacubitril/valsartan improve myocardial remodeling and cardiac perfusion in a rat model of heart failure post-MI compared to valsartan or vehicle?
Absolute Event Rate: 39% vs 34%
p-value: p=<0.05
In a rat model of heart failure post-MI, sacubitril/valsartan improved global LV function, limited remodeling, and increased infarct perfusion more consistently than valsartan alone.
Pfau et al. (2019) studied Heart failure post-myocardial infarction (n=90). Sacubitril/valsartan vs. Vehicle (water) and Valsartan (31 mg/kg/day) was evaluated on Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 1 week after treatment (p=<0.05). Sacubitril/valsartan significantly improved left ventricular ejection fraction (39% vs 34%, P<0.05) and attenuated progressive left ventricular dilation compared to vehicle in rats with heart failure post-myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: