Why the study?
Does Murray's law accurately describe the relationship between arterial diameter and blood flow rate at major arterial bifurcations in dogs?
Does Murray's law accurately describe the relationship between arterial diameter and blood flow rate at major arterial bifurcations in dogs?
The study confirms that Murray's law reasonably approximates the relationship between arterial diameter and blood flow at major bifurcations in dogs, with a slight modification.
Supports modified Murray's law in canine arteries; leaves open validation in human vascular modeling.
Murray derived an Optimum condition for a vascular system by applying a concept of minimum work. Murray's law states that the diameter of a blood vessel is proportional to the cube root of the flow rate within it, and the cube of the diameter of the parent vessel is equal to the sum of the cubes of the diameter of the daughter vessels at an arterial bifurcation. We tested the applicability of Murray's law to our experimental data on the diameters of and flow rates in major arteries of four mongrel dogs in order to elucidate the physiological principles governing arterial architecture. It was found that our experimental data on major arterial bifurcations of the dog fitted Murray's law not exactly but reasonably well, and the relationship between the diameter of parent vessel and that of its daughter vessels at an arterial bifurcation was best expressed by a modified expression of Murray's law given by Σ Ddi3=0.95×Dp3.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
NAIKI et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: