Key result
Log-transformed NT-proBNP levels were more strongly associated with heart failure in men (OR 2.54) than in women (OR 1.46), alongside distinct sex-specific clinical risk factor profiles.
Why the study?
Although sex differences in cardiovascular diseases are recognized, most practice guidelines are not sex-specific, prompting investigation into sex-specific factors associated with heart failure and diastolic left ventricular dysfunction.
Cross-Sectional (n=1,676)
Yes
Odds Ratio: 2.54 (95% CI 1.88–3.44)
p-value: p=0.0229
This study highlights significant sex differences in the risk factors associated with heart failure, suggesting that prevention strategies should be tailored to address the sex-specific impact of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors.
NT-proBNP-HF association stronger in men; hypothesis-generating for sex-specific risk models, should not yet change practice.
BACKGROUND: Although sex differences in cardiovascular diseases are recognised, including differences in incidence, clinical presentation, response to treatments, and outcomes, most of the practice guidelines are not sex-specific. Heart failure (HF) is a major public health challenge, with high health care expenditures, high prevalence, and poor clinical outcomes. The objective was to analyse the sex-specific association of socio-demographics, life-style factors and health characteristics with the prevalence of HF and diastolic left ventricular dysfunction (DLVD) in a cross-sectional population-based study. METHODS: A random sample of 2001 65-84 year-olds underwent physical examination, laboratory measurements, including N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), electrocardiography, and echocardiography. We selected the subjects with no missing values in covariates and echocardiographic parameters and performed a complete case analysis. Sex-specific multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify the factors associated with the prevalence of the diseases, multinomial logistic regression was used to investigate the factors associated to asymptomatic and symptomatic LVD, and spline curves to display the relationship between the conditions and both age and NT-proBNP. RESULTS: In 857 men included, there were 66 cases of HF and 408 cases of DLVD (77% not reporting symptoms). In 819 women, there were 51 cases of HF and 382 of DLVD (79% not reporting symptoms). In men, the factors associated with prevalence of HF were age, ischemic heart disease (IHD), and suffering from three or more comorbid conditions. In women, the factors associated with HF were age, lifestyles (smoking and alcohol), BMI, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation. Age and diabetes were associated to asymptomatic DLVD in both genders. NT-proBNP levels were more strongly associated with HF in men than in women. CONCLUSIONS: There were sex differences in the factors associated with HF. The results suggest that prevention policies should consider the sex-specific impact on cardiac function of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cesaroni et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Heart failure and diastolic left ventricular dysfunction (n=1,676). Log-transformed NT-proBNP was evaluated on Heart failure prevalence in men (per log increase in NT-proBNP) (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.88-3.44, p=0.0229). Log-transformed NT-proBNP levels were more strongly associated with heart failure in men (OR 2.54) than in women (OR 1.46), alongside distinct sex-specific clinical risk factor profiles.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: