Why the study?
Does obesity attenuate the validity and performance of electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy detection in individuals of black African ancestry?
Does obesity attenuate the validity and performance of electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy detection in individuals of black African ancestry?
Obesity significantly attenuates the diagnostic performance of standard ECG voltage criteria for detecting left ventricular hypertrophy in individuals of black African ancestry, rendering them unreliable in this population.
Supports caution using ECG for LVH in obese black African ancestry patients; leaves open prospective validation of adjusted criteria.
AIM: To assess the impact of obesity on the validity and performance of electrocardiographic criteria for the detection of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in a group of participants of black African ancestry with a high prevalence of obesity. METHODS: Electrocardiographic voltage criteria for the detection of echocardiographic LVH [left ventricular mass index (LVMI) >51 g/m²·⁷] were evaluated in 661 participants from a community sample of black African ancestry (43% obese). RESULTS: BMI was inversely associated with Sokolow-Lyon voltages (partial r= -0.27, P < 0.0001) and no BMI-Cornell voltage relations were noted (P = 0.21). BMI was associated with voltage criteria that incorporate only limb lead recordings (r = 0.17-0.23), but these relations were weaker than BMI-LVMI relations (r = 0.36, P < 0.01 and P < 0.0001 for comparisons of r values). All electrocardiographic criteria were as strongly related to blood pressure as LVMI. Sokolow-Lyon voltage-LVMI relations were noted only after adjustments for BMI (P < 0.02) and Sokolow-Lyon voltages showed no performance for LVH detection. Cornell voltages showed significant performance in nonobese [area under receiver operating curve (AUC) = 0.67 ± 0.04, P < 0.0005], but not in obese (AUC = 0.56 ± 0.04, P = 0.08). Electrocardiographic criteria which employ limb-lead recordings only (e.g. RaVL) showed better performance in nonobese than in obese (AUC = 0.75 ± 0.04 and 0.59 ± 0.04, respectively, P < 0.005 for comparison) and markedly reduced specificity for LVH detection in obese (76%) than in nonobese (92%, P < 0.0001) despite similar sensitivities (32 vs. 29%). CONCLUSION: In groups of black African ancestry, obesity contributes to a poor validity and performance of all voltage criteria for the detection of LVH. None of the current criteria are recommended for use in obesity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maunganidze et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: