Higher ambient heat load alters electromyographic activity and forearm blood flow dynamics during sustained and intermittent handgrip exercise.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Heat exposure may alter muscle activation and perfusion during handgrip; leaves open relevance to performance or fatigue in occupational heat stress.
The physiological responses and the magnitude of perceived fatigue (MPF) were estimated from eight healthy men during isometric continuous and intermittent handgrip at 10% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). The physiological responses involved electromyogram (EMG), heart rate (HR), mean blood pressure (MBP) and forearm blood flow during contraction (FBFC) and relaxation (FBFR). The sequence of tests included three different work patterns: 1) continuous handgrip for 30 min, 2) intermittent handgrip (10 sec contraction +5 sec relaxation) for 45 min, 3) intermittent handgrip (10 sec contraction +10 sec relaxation) for 60 min. These experiments were performed on two different heat loads (25 degrees C and 40 degrees C, H.R. 50%). The results were as follows: 1) The localized muscle fatigue in the forearm was observed during the work periods. 2) The mean frequency of EMG was higher at 40 degrees C than 25 degrees C. 3) FBFR was significantly lower than FBFC at 40 degrees C. 4) MPF and MBP were little influenced by the heat load. 5) MPF correlated well with both HR and MBP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
LEE et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: