Why the study?
Valvular dysfunction is a common complication in bicuspid aortic valve patients, but the relationship between valve morphology patterns and dysfunction needed to be determined.
Does bicuspid aortic valve phenotype (RL vs RN, raphe vs no raphe) affect the incidence of aortic regurgitation and aortic stenosis?
Meta-Analysis
Does bicuspid aortic valve phenotype (RL vs RN, raphe vs no raphe) affect the incidence of aortic regurgitation and aortic stenosis?
Bicuspid aortic valve phenotype is significantly associated with the pattern of valvular dysfunction, with BAV-RL and raphe phenotypes predisposing to aortic regurgitation, and BAV-RN predisposing to aortic stenosis.
BAV morphology may guide valvular dysfunction surveillance; confirms associations in meta-analysis of observational data.
BACKGROUND: Valvular dysfunction is a common complication in patients with bicuspid aortic valves (BAV). The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between BAV morphology patterns and valve dysfunction. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CNKI until May 31, 2020, to identify all studies investigating the morphology of BAV and valvular dysfunction, and data were extracted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Data were analyzed using Stata 15.1 software. The additional characteristics (gender, mean age) were collected to perform a meta-regression analysis. RESULTS: Thirteen studies on BAV-RL (n = 2002) versus BAV-RN (n = 1254) and raphe (n = 4001) versus without raphe (n = 673) were included. The BAV-RL patients showed a higher incidence of aortic regurgitation than BAV-RN patients (OR = 1.46; 95% CI: 1.12 to 1.90, p = .005), while the BAV-RL patients showed a lower incidence of aortic stenosis than BAV-RN patients (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.58 to 0.76, p = .000); BAV patients with raphe presents a higher incidence of aortic regurgitation than those without raphe (OR = 1.95, 95% CI: 1.12-3.39, p = .017). No differences were found between raphe and without raphe group in the incidence of aortic stenosis (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.53 to 1.76, p = .907). Mean age and gender had no influence on observed differences. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirmed a relationship between different BAV phenotypes and aortic valve dysfunction. BAV-RL and BAV with raphe are more likely to develop aortic regurgitation, while patients with BAV-RN present a higher possibility to develop aortic stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mai et al. (2021) conducted a meta-analysis in Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV). Bicuspid aortic valve with right and left cusp fusion (BAV-RL) vs. Bicuspid aortic valve with right and noncoronary cusp fusion (BAV-RN) was evaluated on Aortic regurgitation (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.12-1.90, p=0.005).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: