This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Atomically precise nanoclusters (Cu NCs) offer an unmatched view of how active‐site chemistry steers CO 2 electroreduction, yet fine control over competing C 2 products remains elusive. Here we introduce a switchable dual‐ligand strategy that decorates an identical Cu 13 H 10 core with tailored thiolate (‐SR) and phosphine (‐PR 3 ) ligands, creating three isostructural catalysts (NC1 to NC3) whose surface electronics diverge by design. A single‐step change in electron‐withdrawing ligand flips selectivity from C 2 H 4 (Faradaic efficiency, FE C2H4 ≈ 33 %) to EtOH ( FE EtOH ≈ 31 %) without sacrificing ≥ −0.2 A·cm −2 current density. In situ ATR‐SEIRAS and DFT reveal that ‐SR ligands accelerate *COCHO → *CCO dehydration toward C 2 H 4 , whereas electron‐withdrawing ‐PR 3 ligands stabilize *COCH 2 O route to EtOH. These insights deliver a clear design rule: modulate Cu ẟ+ sites through ligand induction to program C─C coupling pathways on demand.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zuo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: