Key result
The COVID-19 pandemic caused 14 patients with heart failure to experience vulnerability, uncertainty, and negative feelings, which they managed through peculiar coping strategies.
Why the study?
This study aimed to explore the lived experience of patients with heart failure during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Patients with heart failure experienced significant vulnerability and uncertainty during the COVID-19 pandemic, requiring specific coping strategies.
Highlights vulnerability in heart failure during crises; leaves open effective support strategies.
This study aimed to explore lived experience of patients with heart failure (HF) during the COVID-19 pandemic. A qualitative study was conducted using an interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA). Data collection performed in March-May 2020, using in-depth, semi-structured interviews on a purposive sample. Data were analyzed according to the IPA methodology, and triangulation, bracketing, journaling, and member checking were used to assure rigor. 14 patients with HF were enrolled, and three main themes described their lived experience during the COVID-19 pandemic: Vulnerability, Hanging in the balance, and Coping strategies. These people felt particularly vulnerable to the novel virus and experienced uncertainty due to hospital organization changes. Because of this, they felt like they were hanging in the balance, experiencing various negative feelings. Nevertheless, they managed to deal with this challenging situation by implementing some peculiar coping strategies. The COVID-19 represents a significant challenge for patients with HF, impacting significantly on their lives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trenta et al. (2021) studied heart failure (n=14). COVID-19 pandemic was evaluated on lived experience during the COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic caused 14 patients with heart failure to experience vulnerability, uncertainty, and negative feelings, which they managed through peculiar coping strategies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: