Key result
A tailored strategy substituting conventional doxorubicin with nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin in high-risk lymphoma patients resulted in a low overall incidence of cardiotoxicity, with no significant LVEF reductions observed in the liposomal group.
Why the study?
Does a personalized approach with biomarker monitoring and tailored substitution with nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin reduce cardiotoxicity in lymphoma patients?
Observational (n=99)
No
Does a personalized approach with biomarker monitoring and tailored substitution with nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin reduce cardiotoxicity in lymphoma patients?
A personalized approach using biomarker monitoring and tailored substitution with nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin in high-risk patients reduces subclinical cardiotoxicity without compromising oncological efficacy in lymphoma patients.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports liposomal doxorubicin substitution in high-risk lymphoma; hypothesis-generating for biomarker-guided personalization pending randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Anthracyclines (AC) are still undeniable drugs in lymphoma treatment, despite occasionally causing cardiotoxicity. Liposomal AC may reduce cardiotoxicity while retaining clinical efficacy; also, biomarker monitoring during chemotherapy allows early detection of cardiac damage, enabling strategies to prevent left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) deterioration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational trial in a real-life population of lymphoma patients, combining advanced echocardiography and biomarkers (Troponin I [TnI]) for early detection of cardiotoxicity; we applied a prespecified policy to minimize cardiotoxicity, selecting patients with higher baseline risk to replace doxorubicin with nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin (NPLD) and starting cardioprotective treatment when subclinical cardiotoxicity was detected. RESULTS: the difference was statistically significant, with more TnI rises in the doxorubicin subgroup. NPLD-treated patients did not experience higher rates of grade 3-4 adverse events. Within the diffuse large B-cell lymphomas category, we observed similar rates of complete and overall responses between doxorubicin- and NPLD-treated patients. CONCLUSION: 2017;22:422-431 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Despite the recent advances of targeted therapy in cancer, old cytotoxic drugs such as anthracyclines (AC) still play a fundamental role in the treatment of many lymphoma patients. We tested and validated in a real-life setting a personalized approach to prevent, detect, and treat AC-induced cardiotoxicity; biomarker monitoring was accomplished by Troponin I measurements before and after chemotherapy infusions, allowing detection of early subclinical cardiotoxicity, which was preemptively treated with cardio-protectants (beta blockers and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors). A telemedicine system allowed interdisciplinary management of the patients with an expert cardiologist. Furthermore, tailored use of liposomal AC following a prespecified policy appeared to prevent the excess cardiotoxicity expected in high-risk patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olivieri et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Lymphoma (n=99). Nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin vs. Conventional doxorubicin was evaluated on Incidence of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity (significant drop in LVEF >10% to a final value <50%; >20%; or drop to a final value <45%). A tailored strategy substituting conventional doxorubicin with nonpegylated liposomal doxorubicin in high-risk lymphoma patients resulted in a low overall incidence of cardiotoxicity, with no significant LVEF reductions observed in the liposomal group.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: