Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To evaluate refractive and visual outcomes of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) to correct high myopia using a new Hartmann-Shack aberrometer. SETTING: Optical Express, Glasgow, United Kingdom. DESIGN: Retrospective noncomparative case series. METHODS: Data of eyes that had wavefront-guided LASIK for high myopia and myopic astigmatism (spherical equivalent [SE] between -6.00 diopters [D] and -10.25 D, up to 5.00 D of cylinder) were analyzed. The treatment profile was derived from a new-generation Hartmann-Shack aberrometer (iDesign Advanced Wavescan). Visual acuities, refractive outcomes, vector analysis of refractive cylinder, and patient satisfaction were assessed. Three-months data are presented. RESULTS: Data were obtained for 621 eyes. The mean manifest SE reduced from -7.28 D ± 1.05 (SD) (range -10.25 to -6.00 D) preoperatively to -0.09 ± 0.44 D (range -2.13 to +1.38 D) at 3 months. The mean manifest cylinder changed from -1.02 ± 0.82 D (range -5.00 to 0.00 D) to -0.27 ± 0.33 D (range -1.75 to 0.00 D) postoperatively. The percentage of eyes achieving an uncorrected distance visual acuity 20/20 or better was 82.4% monocularly and 92.5% binocularly. The mean correction ratio of refractive cylinder was 1.02 ± 0.48, and the mean error of angle was -0.29 ± 14.56 degrees. A postoperative questionnaire revealed high satisfaction with the outcomes of the procedure, with low scores for night-vision phenomena. CONCLUSION: The results in this study were promising in terms of safety, efficacy, and predictability in eyes with high degrees of myopia. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Dr. Schallhorn is a consultant to Abbott Medical Optics, Inc. No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schallhorn et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: