Key result
Prophylactic nadroparin did not prevent DIC syndrome during the first days of chemotherapy (8.7% vs 13.0%) but lowered coagulation activation markers by the eighth day.
Why the study?
Does prophylactic nadroparin reduce intravascular activation of the coagulation system and DIC in patients with acute leukemia during induction chemotherapy?
RCT (n=46)
Does prophylactic nadroparin reduce intravascular activation of the coagulation system and DIC in patients with acute leukemia during induction chemotherapy?
Prophylactic nadroparin may limit intravascular activation of the coagulation system during later stages of induction chemotherapy in acute leukemia, though it does not prevent early DIC.
UNLABELLED: Intravascular activation of the coagulation system can already be observed in the majority of patients with acute leukemia (AL) at the time of diagnosis. This activation can be further enhanced by chemotherapy. The study comprised of 46 patients with AL, randomly divided into two groups. Twenty-three patients received prophylactic doses of nadroparin (Fraxiparine). Thrombin-antithrombin complexes (TAT), prothrombin fragment (F1 + 2), D-dimer (DD), plasmin-antiplasmin complexes (PAP) and antithrombin III (AT III) activity were determined in all patients. The tests were performed before treatment, and on the 3rd and 8th days of chemotherapy. The TAT, F1 + 2, DD and PAP concentrations were found to be elevated in 83% of patients already at the time of diagnosis. No significant difference between either groups test results was noted when either tested before treatment or on the third day of therapy. DIC (disseminated intravascular coagulation) syndrome appeared in two patients receiving heparin prophylaxis and in three patients to whom this treatment was not administered. The concentrations of activation markers on the eighth day of chemotherapy were lower than at the beginning of treatment in most of the patients receiving nadroparin. At this time there were no laboratory signs of DIC in any of the patients receiving heparin prophylaxis. IN CONCLUSION: although the application of prophylactic doses of nadroparin does not prevent DIC syndrome during first days of chemotherapy, it may limit the intravascular activation of the coagulation system during later chemotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chojnowski et al. (2002) conducted an RCT in Acute leukemia (n=46). Nadroparin vs. No heparin prophylaxis was evaluated on DIC (disseminated intravascular coagulation) syndrome. Prophylactic nadroparin did not prevent DIC syndrome during the first days of chemotherapy (8.7% vs 13.0%) but lowered coagulation activation markers by the eighth day.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: