Key result
Patients who perceived physiological or psychological risk factors as the cause of their cardiac condition experienced significantly higher anxiety levels (MD 5.03 and 5.32, respectively) compared to those who attributed it to behavioral factors.
Why the study?
Does the attitude toward disease risk factors affect the level of clinical anxiety in patients beginning a cardiac rehabilitation program?
Cross-Sectional (n=603)
No
Does the attitude toward disease risk factors affect the level of clinical anxiety in patients beginning a cardiac rehabilitation program?
Mean Difference: 5.03 (95% CI 0.684–9.383)
Absolute Event Rate: 32.4% vs 27.4%
p-value: p=0.012
Patients entering cardiac rehabilitation who attribute their disease to physiological or psychological factors experience significantly higher anxiety than those who attribute it to behavioral factors, likely due to a perceived lack of control.
May flag higher anxiety risk at cardiac rehab entry; hypothesis-generating for perception-targeted interventions.
BACKGROUND: In a cardiac patient, anxiety is the result of the individual's perception of the treatment and is characterized by inability to predict, control, or achieve the desired treatment outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This study was carried out to investigate the extent of clinical anxiety in patients who underwent a cardiac rehabilitation program with different attitudes toward the disease risk factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The administrative data of this retrospective study were obtained from the database of the cardiac rehabilitation department of a hospital in Iran. The demographic and clinical information of 603 patients from April 2006 to April 2011 was collected using compiled forms of this database, the Beck anxiety inventory, and the structured clinical interview for axis I disorders. The univariate analysis of variance and the Bonferroni post-hoc analysis were used for data analysis. RESULTS: After controlling for gender and educational level, we observed statistically significant differences in the modified means between the patients who considered the behavioral risk factors and those who considered the physiological risk factors (P = 0.012, MD = 5.03) and between the patients who regarded the behavioral risk factors and those who regarded the psychological risk factors (P = 0.0005, MD = 5.32) as the underlying cause of their cardiac condition, which means that the level of anxiety in the physiological and psychological groups was higher than that in the behavioral group. CONCLUSIONS: The anxiety of patients can be controlled through alteration in their attitudes toward the disease risk factors on the grounds that psychological or physiological factors per se do not trigger the occurrence of the disease, whereas behavioral risk factors, as the controlling agent, significantly influence its occurrence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saeidi et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiac disease requiring rehabilitation (n=603). Perceiving physiological or psychological risk factors as the cause of disease vs. Perceiving behavioral risk factors as the cause of disease was evaluated on Clinical anxiety score (Beck Anxiety Inventory) (MD 5.03, 95% CI 0.684-9.383, p=0.012). Patients who perceived physiological or psychological risk factors as the cause of their cardiac condition experienced significantly higher anxiety levels (MD 5.03 and 5.32, respectively) compared to those who attributed it to behavioral factors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: