Key result
High red cell distribution width (≥13.3%) was associated with an increased risk of unprovoked deep-vein thrombosis compared to the lowest quartile (≤12.3%) (HR 1.8; 95% CI 1.1-3.1).
Why the study?
Does high red cell distribution width (RDW) predict incident VTE, recurrent VTE, and case-fatality in a general population?
Cohort (n=26,223)
Does high red cell distribution width (RDW) predict incident VTE, recurrent VTE, and case-fatality in a general population?
Hazard Ratio: 1.8 (95% CI 1.1–3.1)
Elevated red cell distribution width (≥13.3%) is an independent risk factor for incident VTE and post-VTE all-cause mortality in the general population.
RDW may refine VTE risk assessment in general populations; leaves open its added value in prediction models or clinical decisions.
Recent studies suggest an association between red cell distribution width (RDW) and incident venous thromboembolism (VTE). We aimed to investigate the impact of RDW on risk of incident and recurrent VTE, and case-fatality, in a general population. RDW was measured in 26,223 participants enrolled in the Tromsø Study in 1994-1995. Incident and recurrent VTE events and deaths during follow-up were registered until January 1, 2012. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). There were 647 incident VTE events during a median of 16.8 years of follow-up. Individuals with RDW in the highest quartile (RDW≥13.3%) had 50% higher risk of an incident VTE than those in the lowest quartile (RDW≤12.3%). The association was strongest for unprovoked deep-vein thrombosis (HR highest vs lowest quartile of RDW: 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.1). VTE patients with baseline RDW≥13.3% had 30% higher risk of all-cause mortality after the initial VTE event than VTE patients with RDW<13.3%. There were no association between RDW and risk of recurrent VTE. Our findings suggest that high RDW is a risk factor of incident VTE, and that RDW is a predictor of all-cause mortality in VTE patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lappegård et al. (2014) conducted a cohort in venous thromboembolism (n=26,223). High red cell distribution width (RDW ≥13.3%) vs. Low red cell distribution width (RDW ≤12.3%) was evaluated on unprovoked deep-vein thrombosis (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1-3.1). High red cell distribution width (≥13.3%) was associated with an increased risk of unprovoked deep-vein thrombosis compared to the lowest quartile (≤12.3%) (HR 1.8; 95% CI 1.1-3.1).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: