Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Forest protection (spraying of biological insecticide), salvage harvesting, and strategic re-planning are typical mitigation options to reduce wood supply impacts caused by spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana [Clem.]) defoliation. However, all such measures are expensive and difficult to implement, and decisions about if and to what extent such measures should be applied hinge on the magnitude of benefits and associated costs. We used an integrated forest estate pest-impact planning model to quantify harvest impacts for three plausible outbreak scenarios, and the effect of these typical mitigation strategies for 3.0 million ha in New Brunswick. Cumulative harvest reductions, relative to the no defoliation case, reached 18% and 25% by 2052 under moderate and severe defoliation patterns, respectively. We demonstrate that up to 30% to 50% of these projected reductions could be avoided through foliage protection treatments, depending on the outbreak scenario. Salvage and re-planning mitigated harvest losses by up to 20% in the short term (20 to 25 years), but had little benefit over the long run (40+ years). Even with aggressive implementation of all mitigation measures, significant harvest impacts (10% reduction from 2017 to 2042) were unavoidable, regardless of outbreak scenario.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hennigar et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: