Key result
Surgical resection was performed in 87.3% of cardiac hemangioma cases, yielding favorable outcomes and low recurrence, though long-term follow-up was inconsistent.
Why the study?
Cardiac hemangiomas are rare benign vascular tumors that can cause significant clinical effects, motivating an updated systematic analysis of recent cases regarding diagnosis, presentation, and treatment outcomes.
Systematic Review (n=55)
Surgical resection of cardiac hemangiomas yields favorable outcomes with low recurrence, but standardized follow-up protocols are needed due to inconsistent reporting.
Background/Objectives: Cardiac hemangiomas are rare benign vascular tumors, accounting for less than 2% of primary cardiac tumors. Despite their rarity, they can cause significant clinical effects depending on their size and location. This systematic review aims to provide an updated analysis of recent cases, focusing on epidemiology, histopathological subtypes, clinical presentation, diagnostic approaches, and treatment outcomes. Methods: A systematic search of the PubMed database identified case reports and series published between 2019 and 2025. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 55 eligible cases were selected for analysis. Data were extracted on patient demographics, tumor characteristics, imaging methods, treatment strategies, and follow-up outcomes. Results: Cavernous hemangiomas were the most commonly reported subtype. Patient ages ranged from infancy to over 85 years, with a slight predominance in females. Presentations varied from asymptomatic incidental findings to symptoms such as dyspnea and chest pain. Echocardiography was the primary diagnostic tool in over 80% of cases. Surgical resection was performed in 87.3% of patients, yielding favorable outcomes and low recurrence. However, follow-up duration was inconsistent, and long-term outcomes were underreported, underscoring the lack of standardized surveillance protocols. This variability limits clinicians’ ability to assess recurrence risk and long-term prognosis, highlighting the need for evidence-based guidelines to inform structured follow-up and improve patient care. Conclusions: The increasing number of published cases likely reflects improved diagnostic imaging and greater clinical awareness. While surgery remains the preferred treatment, the variability in follow-up and diagnostic reporting highlights the need for standardized protocols. Further studies are warranted to clarify the natural history, refine classification systems, and establish evidence-based guidelines for the management of this rare cardiac tumor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Munteanu et al. (2025) conducted a systematic review in Cardiac hemangiomas (n=55). Surgical resection was evaluated on Surgical resection rate. Surgical resection was performed in 87.3% of cardiac hemangioma cases, yielding favorable outcomes and low recurrence, though long-term follow-up was inconsistent.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: