Key result
Coronary endarterectomy during CABG yielded similar long-term survival compared to reconstruction without endarterectomy (81.6% vs 83.2%, p=0.531).
Why the study?
The study was conducted to evaluate long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes of coronary artery reconstructive procedures with or without endarterectomy.
Does coronary endarterectomy during CABG improve long-term survival and graft patency in patients with diffuse coronary atherosclerosis compared to reconstruction without endarterectomy?
Cohort (n=1,081)
Does coronary endarterectomy during CABG improve long-term survival and graft patency in patients with diffuse coronary atherosclerosis compared to reconstruction without endarterectomy?
Absolute Event Rate: 81.6% vs 83.2%
p-value: p=0.531
Coronary endarterectomy and extended reconstruction without endarterectomy during CABG offer comparable long-term survival in patients with diffuse coronary atherosclerosis.
Endarterectomy during CABG was associated with similar survival; leaves open optimal technique and graft patency in diffuse atherosclerosis.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Белаш et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Diffuse coronary atherosclerosis (n=1,081). Coronary endarterectomy vs. Coronary artery reconstruction without endarterectomy was evaluated on Long-term survival (p=0.531). Coronary endarterectomy during CABG yielded similar long-term survival compared to reconstruction without endarterectomy (81.6% vs 83.2%, p=0.531).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: