Key result
Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with diffuse coronary lesions resulted in a 1-year recurrent angina rate of 8.2% compared to 4.9% in those with local lesions (p=0.343).
Why the study?
The study was conducted to compare 1-year outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with diffuse versus local coronary artery lesions.
Does coronary artery bypass grafting yield comparable 1-year outcomes in patients with diffuse versus local coronary artery lesions?
Cohort (n=296)
Does coronary artery bypass grafting yield comparable 1-year outcomes in patients with diffuse versus local coronary artery lesions?
Absolute Event Rate: 8.2% vs 4.9%
p-value: p=0.343
CABG with complete revascularization using microsurgical techniques provides comparable 1-year clinical outcomes for patients with diffuse coronary lesions compared to those with local lesions.
CABG yields comparable angina relief regardless of lesion extent; leaves open prognostic impact of diffuse disease.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shiryaev et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease (n=296). Diffuse coronary artery lesions vs. Local coronary artery lesions was evaluated on Recurrent angina at 1 year (p=0.343). Coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with diffuse coronary lesions resulted in a 1-year recurrent angina rate of 8.2% compared to 4.9% in those with local lesions (p=0.343).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: