Key result
The EVERBIO II trial is a planned randomized study comparing bioresorbable vascular scaffolds with everolimus-eluting and biolimus-eluting stents; as a study protocol, no results are reported.
Why the study?
Does an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold improve in-segment late lumen loss at 9 months compared to everolimus-eluting and biolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
RCT (n=240)
Assessor-blinded
Computer-generated numbers
No
Does an everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold improve in-segment late lumen loss at 9 months compared to everolimus-eluting and biolimus-eluting stents in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention?
The EVERBIO II trial protocol outlines a randomized comparison of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds versus everolimus- and biolimus-eluting stents to evaluate angiographic and clinical outcomes in an all-comers PCI population.
Leaves open whether bioresorbable scaffolds reduce late lumen loss versus stents; RCT underway to address this in all-comers PCI.
BACKGROUND: Second-generation everolimus-eluting stents (EES) and third generation biolimus-eluting stents (BES) have been shown to be superior to first-generation paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES) and second-generation sirolimus-eluting stents (SES). However, neointimal proliferation and very late stent thrombosis is still an unresolved issue of drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation overall. The Absorb™ (Abbott Vascular, Abbott Park, IL, USA) is the first CE approved DES with a bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) thought to reduce long-term complication rates. The EVERBIO II trial was set up to compare the BVS safety and efficacy with both EES and BES in all patients viable for inclusion. METHODS/DESIGN: The EVERBIO II trial is a single-center, assessor-blinded, randomized trial. The study population consists of all patients aged≥18 years old undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Exclusion criterion is where the lesion cannot be treated with BVS (reference vessel diameter>4.0 mm). A total of 240 patients will be enrolled and randomly assigned into 3 groups of 80 with either BVS, EES or BES implantation. All patients will undergo a follow-up angiography study at 9 months. Clinical follow-up for up to 5 years will be conducted by telephone. The primary endpoint is in-segment late lumen loss at 9 months measured by quantitative coronary angiography. Secondary endpoints are patient-oriented major adverse cardiac event (MACE) (death, myocardial infarction and target-vessel revascularization), device-oriented MACE (cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target-lesion revascularization), stent thrombosis according to ARC and binary restenosis at follow-up 12 months angiography. DISCUSSION: EVERBIO II is an independent, randomized study, aiming to compare the clinical efficacy, angiographic outcomes and safety of BVS, EES and BES in all comer patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial listed in clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01711931.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arroyo et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in Coronary artery disease (n=240). Bioresorbable vascular scaffold (Absorb) vs. Everolimus-eluting stent (Promus Element) and Biolimus-eluting stent (Biomatrix Flex) was evaluated on In-segment late lumen loss at 9 months measured by quantitative coronary angiography. The EVERBIO II trial is a planned randomized study comparing bioresorbable vascular scaffolds with everolimus-eluting and biolimus-eluting stents; as a study protocol, no results are reported.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: