Key result
Double heterozygosity for Factor V Leiden and Factor II G20210A mutations was associated with a substantially increased risk of venous thromboembolism (OR 20.0; 95% CI 11.1-36.1).
Why the study?
Does the presence of both Factor V Leiden and Factor II G20210A mutations increase the risk of venous thromboembolism compared to controls?
Population
5,514 individuals from 8 pooled case-control studies.
Comparison
Presence of both Factor V Leiden and Factor II… vs Individuals without these mutations (controls)
Design
Meta-analysis
Authors
Loading...
May inform family screening and prophylaxis decisions; confirms synergistic risk elevation but leaves optimal strategies open.
Meta-Analysis (n=5,514)
Yes
Does the presence of both Factor V Leiden and Factor II G20210A mutations increase the risk of venous thromboembolism compared to controls?
Odds Ratio: 20 (95% CI 11.1–36.1)
Absolute Event Rate: 2.2% vs 0%
The combined presence of Factor V Leiden and Factor II G20210A mutations synergistically increases the risk of venous thromboembolism by 20-fold.
Rosendaal et al. (2001) conducted a meta-analysis in Venous Thromboembolism (n=5,514). Double heterozygosity for Factor V Leiden and Factor II G20210A mutations vs. Controls without double heterozygosity was evaluated on Venous thromboembolism (OR 20.0, 95% CI 11.1-36.1). Double heterozygosity for Factor V Leiden and Factor II G20210A mutations was associated with a substantially increased risk of venous thromboembolism (OR 20.0; 95% CI 11.1-36.1).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: