Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
January 1, 2001Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Combined Effect of Factor V Leiden and Prothrombin 20210A on the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Double heterozygosity for Factor V Leiden and Factor II G20210A mutations was associated with a substantially increased risk of venous thromboembolism (OR 20.0; 95% CI 11.1-36.1).

Why the study?

Does the presence of both Factor V Leiden and Factor II G20210A mutations increase the risk of venous thromboembolism compared to controls?

Population

5,514 individuals from 8 pooled case-control studies.

Comparison

Presence of both Factor V Leiden and Factor II… vs Individuals without these mutations (controls)

Design

Meta-analysis

Authors

Frits R. Rosendaal
Frits R. RosendaalVascular Medicine
MCMarco CattaneoVascular MedicineMMMaurizio MargaglioneUniversity of Foggia

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

May inform family screening and prophylaxis decisions; confirms synergistic risk elevation but leaves optimal strategies open.

Study Design

Type

Meta-Analysis (n=5,514)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does the presence of both Factor V Leiden and Factor II G20210A mutations increase the risk of venous thromboembolism compared to controls?

P
Population
5,514 participants (2,310 cases and 3,204 controls) from a pooled analysis of 8 case-control studies evaluating genetic risk factors for venous thromboembolism.
E
Exposure
Presence of both Factor V Leiden and Factor II G20210A mutations (double heterozygotes)
C
Comparator
Individuals without these mutations (controls)
O
Outcome
Risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE)hard clinical

Main Result

Odds Ratio: 20 (95% CI 11.1–36.1)

Absolute Event Rate: 2.2% vs 0%

The combined presence of Factor V Leiden and Factor II G20210A mutations synergistically increases the risk of venous thromboembolism by 20-fold.

Cite This Study

Rosendaal et al. (2001) conducted a meta-analysis in Venous Thromboembolism (n=5,514). Double heterozygosity for Factor V Leiden and Factor II G20210A mutations vs. Controls without double heterozygosity was evaluated on Venous thromboembolism (OR 20.0, 95% CI 11.1-36.1). Double heterozygosity for Factor V Leiden and Factor II G20210A mutations was associated with a substantially increased risk of venous thromboembolism (OR 20.0; 95% CI 11.1-36.1).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a98c3ea08ab6325d2e10a4bhttps://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1616136
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Venous Thrombosis with Both Heterozygous Factor V Leiden (R507Q) and Factor II (G20210A) Mutations2012 · 1 citations
  2. 2Coexistence of Factor V Leiden and Factor II A20210 Mutations and Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism1999 · 120 citations
  3. 3The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism among heterozygous carriers of factor V Leiden or prothrombin G20210A mutation. A systematic review of prospective studies2007 · 179 citations
  4. 4A family history can display a synergistic effect of atherogenic and prothrombotic risk in pregnancy2001 · 1 citations
  5. 5Prevalence of factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations in unselected patients with venous thromboembolism2000 · 67 citations