Key result
Factor V Leiden mutation prevalence was 10.5% in primary PE (OR 2.10; 95% CI 0.68-5.45) and 19.1% in DVT with PE (OR 4.20; 95% CI 1.54-10.30) compared to 5.3% in controls without DVT/PE.
Why the study?
What is the prevalence of factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations in patients with suspected DVT and/or PE?
Cohort (n=748)
What is the prevalence of factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations in patients with suspected DVT and/or PE?
Effect estimate: OR 2.10 (95% CI 0.68-5.45)
Absolute Event Rate: 10.5% vs 5.3%
Factor V Leiden mutation is less frequently associated with primary pulmonary embolism compared to deep vein thrombosis with or without PE, while prothrombin G20210A mutation prevalence does not significantly differ.
May not support routine Factor V Leiden testing in isolated PE; leaves open differential association with DVT versus primary PE.
We determined the prevalence of factor V Leiden and of prothrombin G20210A mutations in a cohort of unselected outpatients (n = 748) referred for suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE) and a pooled analysis of similar studies was also performed. Based on the clinical presentation, the prevalence of factor V Leiden was 15.7% in the 83 patients with DVT and 14.1% in the 99 patients with PE compared with 5.3% in patients without DVT and/or PE (control group). The prevalence of the prothrombin G20210A mutation did not differ among the three groups (3.9% for controls, 4. 8% for DVT and 3.9% for PE patients). We then divided the 99 patients with PE by separately analysing those with PE but without DVT (n = 57) and those with PE and DVT (n = 42). Compared with the control group, the prevalence of factor V Leiden was 10.5%, odds ratio (OR) 2.10 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.68-5.45] in patients with primary PE and 19.1%, OR 4.20 (95% CI 1.54-10.30) in patients with DVT and PE. For the prothrombin G20210A mutation, no statistically significant differences were found between the control group and the three other groups. In conclusion, our data and the pooled analysis indicate that patients with primary PE are less often affected by the factor V Leiden mutation. No statistically significant differences were observed between patients and controls for the prothrombin G20210A mutation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moerloose et al. (2000) conducted a cohort in Venous thromboembolism (n=748). Factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A mutations vs. Patients without DVT and/or PE was evaluated on Prevalence of factor V Leiden (OR 2.10, 95% CI 0.68-5.45). Factor V Leiden mutation prevalence was 10.5% in primary PE (OR 2.10; 95% CI 0.68-5.45) and 19.1% in DVT with PE (OR 4.20; 95% CI 1.54-10.30) compared to 5.3% in controls without DVT/PE.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: