Key result
A review of 161 published cases demonstrates that multivessel totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting is feasible and meets open surgery standards, despite higher conversion rates.
Why the study?
Is robotic totally endoscopic multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting feasible and effective compared to open surgery?
Population
Patients with multivessel coronary artery disease referred for coronary artery bypass surgery
Comparison
Robotic totally endoscopic multivessel coronary… vs Open coronary bypass surgery through sternotomy
Design
Review
Authors
Loading...
Should not yet change practice; leaves open the role of multivessel totally endoscopic CABG pending randomized data.
Is robotic totally endoscopic multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting feasible and effective compared to open surgery?
Robotic totally endoscopic multivessel CABG is feasible and offers preserved sternum and short recovery, though it is technically demanding with higher conversion rates.
Bonatti et al. (2012) conducted a review in Multivessel coronary artery disease (n=161). Multivessel totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting (TECAB) vs. Open coronary bypass surgery (historical standard) was evaluated. A review of 161 published cases demonstrates that multivessel totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting is feasible and meets open surgery standards, despite higher conversion rates.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: