Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the present work, membrane contactors using both porous and nonporous polymeric hollow fiber membranes with ionic liquids as absorbent were developed for precombustion CO 2 capture at elevated temperature and pressures. 1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium tricyanomethanide [Bmim][TCM] was selected as the ILs absorbent. The compatibility and stability of six different polymeric membranes were evaluated, while the porous PTFE membrane and nonporous Teflon-PP composite membrane were considered to be the most suitable membranes for this application. Both membrane configurations were tested and showed comparable separation performances: CO 2 flux values of 4.86 × 10 –4 and 4.75 × 10 –4 mol m –2 s –1 were obtained for the porous PTFE and nonporous Teflon-PP membrane contactor at 20 bar with a gas flow rate of 200 mL min –1, respectively. The Teflon-PP composite membrane exhibited better stability as compared to the porous PTFE membrane in a 14 day test.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dai et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: