Key result
Patients who switched from home to in-center dialysis experienced a significant decrease in physical functioning over time, whereas health-related quality of life remained stable for those who did not change modalities.
Why the study?
Health-related quality of life varies among dialysis patients, but little is known about the association of dialysis modality with health-related quality of life over time.
Does home dialysis modality compared to in-center hemodialysis improve health-related quality of life over time in incident chronic dialysis patients?
Cohort (n=5,114)
Yes
Does home dialysis modality compared to in-center hemodialysis improve health-related quality of life over time in incident chronic dialysis patients?
p-value: p=<0.05
Health-related quality of life remains stable for dialysis patients who stay on their initial modality, but physical functioning significantly declines in those who switch from home to in-center dialysis.
Modality switches from home to in-center dialysis warrant monitoring for physical decline; leaves open causal effects on HrQoL in incident patients.
BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (HrQoL) varies among dialysis patients. However, little is known about the association of dialysis modality with HrQoL over time. We describe longitudinal patterns of HrQoL among chronic dialysis patients by treatment modality. METHODS: National retrospective cohort study of adult patients who initiated in-center dialysis or a home modality (peritoneal or home hemodialysis) between 1/2013 and 6/2015. Patients remained on the same modality for the first 120 days of the first two years. HrQoL was assessed by the Kidney Disease and Quality of Life-36 (KDQOL) survey in the first 120 days of the first two years after dialysis initiation. Home modality patients were matched to in-center patients in a 1:5 fashion. RESULTS: In-center (n=4234) and home modality (n=880) patients had similar demographic and clinical characteristics. In-center dialysis patients had lower mean KDQOL scores across several domains compared to home modality patients. For patients who remained on the same modality, there was no change in HrQoL. However, there were trends towards clinically meaningful changes in several aspects of HrQoL for patients who switched modalities. Specifically, physical functioning decreased for patients who switched from home to in-center dialysis (p< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Among a national cohort of chronic dialysis patients, there was a trend towards different patterns of HrQoL life that were only observed among patients who changed modality. Patients who switched from home to in-center modalities had significant lower physical functioning over time. Providers and patients should be mindful of HrQoL changes that may occur with dialysis modality change.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eneanya et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in End-stage renal disease (ESRD) (n=5,114). Dialysis modality change (home to in-center) vs. Remaining on the same dialysis modality was evaluated on Change in Physical Component Summary (PCS) score (95% CI 0.1-7.3, p=<0.05). Patients who switched from home to in-center dialysis experienced a significant decrease in physical functioning over time, whereas health-related quality of life remained stable for those who did not change modalities.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: