Why the study?
Older care home residents with AF are at high risk of adverse health events, and the feasibility of pharmacist-led medicines optimisation using the ABC pathway needed evaluation.
Is a pharmacist-led medication review based on the ABC pathway feasible and effective for optimizing medicines in older care home residents with atrial fibrillation?
RCT (n=21)
Single-blind
Individually randomized, stratified by site
Yes
Is a pharmacist-led medication review based on the ABC pathway feasible and effective for optimizing medicines in older care home residents with atrial fibrillation?
While implementing the ABC pathway via pharmacist-led review is feasible in care homes, it may not significantly alter prescribing rates because low adherence to guideline-recommended therapy in this frail population is often driven by deliberate risk-benefit clinical decisions.
Supports feasibility of pharmacist-led ABC pathway in care homes; leaves open effects on outcomes in older AF residents.
BACKGROUND: Older care home residents are a vulnerable group of people with atrial fibrillation (AF) at high risk of adverse health events. The Atrial Fibrillation Better Care (ABC: Avoid stroke; Better symptom management; Cardiovascular and other comorbidity management) pathway is the gold-standard approach toward integrated AF care, and pharmacists are a potential resource with regards to its' implementation. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of pharmacist-led medicines optimisation in care home residents, based on the ABC pathway compared to usual care. METHODS: Individually randomised, prospective pilot and feasibility study of older (aged ≥ 65 years) care home residents with AF (ISRCTN14747952); residents randomised to ABC pathway optimised care versus usual care. The primary outcome was a description of study feasibility (resident and care home recruitment and retention). Secondary outcomes included the number and type of pharmacist medication recommendations and general practitioner (GP) implementation. RESULTS: Twenty-one residents were recruited and 11 (mean age [standard deviation] 85.0 [6.5] years, 63.6% female) were randomised to receive pharmacist-led medicines optimisation. Only 3/11 residents were adherent to all three components of the ABC pathway. Adherence was higher to 'A' (9/11 residents) and 'B' (9/11 residents) components compared to 'C' (3/11 residents). Four ABC-specific medicines recommendations were made for three residents, and two were implemented by residents' GPs. Overall ABC adherence rates did not change after pharmacist medication review, but adherence to 'A' increased (from 9/11 to 10/11 residents). Other ABC recommendations were inappropriate given residents' co-morbidities and risk of medication-related adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: The ABC pathway as a framework was feasible to implement for pharmacist medication review, but most residents' medications were already optimised. Low rates of adherence to guideline-recommended therapy were a result of active decisions not to treat after assessment of the net risk-benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ritchie et al. (2024) conducted an RCT in Atrial fibrillation (n=21). Pharmacist-led medicines optimisation based on the ABC pathway vs. Usual care was evaluated on Study feasibility (resident and care home recruitment and retention).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: