Key result
Children with bicuspid aortic valves had higher circulating levels of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 compared to those with tricuspid aortic valves, though levels did not differ by aortopathy status.
Why the study?
Bicuspid aortic valve is frequently associated with valvular dysfunction and aortic remodeling, prompting examination of circulating extracellular matrix biomarkers in affected children.
Do circulating extracellular matrix-remodeling biomarkers differ between children with bicuspid aortic valve and those with tricuspid aortic valve?
Cross-Sectional (n=43)
No
Do circulating extracellular matrix-remodeling biomarkers differ between children with bicuspid aortic valve and those with tricuspid aortic valve?
Effect estimate: Median difference 193.95 ng/mL
Absolute Event Rate: 346.05% vs 152.1%
p-value: p=<0.05
Circulating MMP-9 and TIMP-1 are elevated in children with bicuspid aortic valves compared to tricuspid aortic valves, but do not differentiate those with and without aortopathy.
Matrix biomarker elevations in pediatric BAV are hypothesis-generating; do not yet inform aortopathy risk assessment or practice.
Background/Objectives: Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is frequently associated with valvular dysfunction and aortic remodeling. This exploratory study examined cross-sectional associations between circulating extracellular matrix-related biomarkers and concurrent echocardiographic characteristics in children with BAV. Methods: We included 43 pediatric participants—26 with BAV and 17 with tricuspid aortic valves (TAV). All participants underwent clinical assessment, transthoracic echocardiography, and serum biomarker quantification at the same study visit. MMP-2, MMP-9, TIMP-1, and TGF-β1 were measured using ELISA. Biomarker levels were compared between the BAV and TAV groups and, within the BAV group, according to the presence of concurrent aortopathy, aortic stenosis, and aortic regurgitation. Results: MMP-9, TIMP-1, and the MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio were higher in the BAV group than in the TAV comparison group. Within the BAV cohort, none of the investigated biomarkers differed significantly between participants with and without aortopathy. TGF-β1 was higher in BAV patients with aortic stenosis, whereas the MMP-9/TIMP-1 ratio showed a borderline difference according to aortic regurgitation status; these subgroup findings are exploratory and limited by small sample size and multiple comparisons. Conclusions: In this selected pediatric cohort, circulating MMP-9 and TIMP-1 levels differed between children with BAV and the TAV comparison group. However, none of the investigated biomarkers differed significantly between BAV patients with and without aortopathy. These cross-sectional findings describe exploratory associations with the BAV phenotype but do not establish diagnostic, predictive, or prognostic utility. Larger longitudinal studies including the broader clinical spectrum of BAV and independent validation cohorts are required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Man et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Bicuspid aortic valve (n=43). Bicuspid aortic valve vs. Tricuspid aortic valve was evaluated on Circulating MMP-9 concentration (ng/mL) (Median difference 193.95 ng/mL, p=<0.05). Children with bicuspid aortic valves had higher circulating levels of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 compared to those with tricuspid aortic valves, though levels did not differ by aortopathy status.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: