Key result
Women undergoing elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair had a significantly higher risk of major cardiovascular events or death compared to men (OR 1.33; 95% CI 1.12-1.59).
Why the study?
It was unclear whether sex-specific differences in preoperative and perioperative standard of care account for disparity in outcomes after elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.
Do sex-specific differences in standard of care account for disparities in major adverse cardiovascular events and death after elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair?
Cohort (n=21,810)
Yes
Do sex-specific differences in standard of care account for disparities in major adverse cardiovascular events and death after elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair?
Odds Ratio: 1.33 (95% CI 1.12–1.59)
p-value: p=<0.001
Women undergoing elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair have a higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and death than men, a disparity that is only partially explained by differences in standard of care.
BACKGROUND: This study investigated whether sex-specific differences in preoperative/perioperative standard of care (SOC) account for disparity in outcomes after elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs (2013-2020) using depersonalized patient-level National Vascular Registry data. SOC was defined for waiting times, preoperative assessment (multidisciplinary/anaesthetic review), cardiovascular risk prevention, and perioperative medication. The primary outcome was major cardiovascular event and/or death (MACED). RESULTS: Some 21 810 patients with an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm were included, 2380 women and 19 430 men. Women less often underwent aneurysm repair within SOC waiting times (51.5 versus 59.3 per cent; P < 0.001), but were equally likely to receive preoperative assessment (72.1 versus 72.5 per cent; P = 0.742). Women were less likely to receive secondary prevention for known cardiac disease (34.9 versus 39.6 per cent; P = 0.015), but more often met overall cardiovascular risk prevention standards (52.1 versus 47.3 per cent; P < 0.001). Women were at greater risk of MACED (open: 12.0 versus 8.9 per cent, P < 0.001; endovascular: 4.9 versus 2.9 per cent, P < 0.001; risk-adjusted OR 1.33, 95 per cent c.i. 1.12 to 1.59). A significant reduction in the odds of MACED was associated with preoperative assessment (OR 0.86, 0.75 to 0.98) and SOC waiting times (OR 0.78, 0.69 to 0.87). There was insufficient evidence to confirm a significant sex-specific difference in the effect of SOC preoperative assessment (women: OR 0.69, 0.50 to 0.97; men: OR 0.89, 0.77 to 1.03; interaction P = 0.170) or SOC waiting times (women: OR 0.84, 0.62 to 1.16; men: OR 0.76, 0.67 to 0.87; interaction P = 0.570) on the risk of MACED. CONCLUSION: SOC waiting times and preoperative assessment were not met for both sexes, which was associated with an increased risk of MACED. Sex-specific differences in SOC attenuated but did not fully account for the increased risk of MACED in women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pouncey et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (n=21,810). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on major cardiovascular event and/or death (MACED) (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.12 to 1.59, p=<0.001). Women undergoing elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair had a significantly higher risk of major cardiovascular events or death compared to men (OR 1.33; 95% CI 1.12-1.59).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: