Key result
This article reviews a recently published trial evaluating atrioventricular nodal ablation for rate control in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Why the study?
Does atrioventricular nodal ablation improve outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and severe heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy?
Does atrioventricular nodal ablation improve outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and severe heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy?
This article reviews a recent trial evaluating the role of atrioventricular nodal ablation for rate control in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and severe heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Prevalence of persistent atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy remains high. Several factors, including suboptimal biventricular capture rates, compound the significant mortality and response rates in patients with atrial fibrillation and severe heart failure. Atrioventricular nodal ablation provides the best mean of rate control in this population. In this article, the authors evaluate a recently published trial addressing this issue in a prospective fashion and discuss the results and clinical applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chai et al. (2012) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy. Atrioventricular nodal ablation was evaluated. This article reviews a recently published trial evaluating atrioventricular nodal ablation for rate control in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: