Key result
The combination of previous preeclampsia and type 1 diabetes was associated with a markedly increased risk of preclinical carotid plaque (OR 28.1; 95% CI 2.67-296.4).
Why the study?
Although preeclampsia is an established cardiovascular risk factor in the general population, its role in type 1 diabetes has been scarcely studied.
Is previous preeclampsia associated with increased preclinical carotid atherosclerosis in women with type 1 diabetes?
Cross-Sectional (n=112)
Is previous preeclampsia associated with increased preclinical carotid atherosclerosis in women with type 1 diabetes?
Odds Ratio: 28.1 (95% CI 2.67–296.4)
Previous preeclampsia is independently associated with preclinical atherosclerosis in women with type 1 diabetes, suggesting an additive cardiovascular risk that may warrant enhanced screening.
Preeclampsia history may identify higher preclinical atherosclerosis risk in T1D women; leaves open independent prognostic value and need for prospective validation.
PURPOSE: Although preeclampsia (PE) is a well-established cardiovascular risk factor (CVRF) in the general population, its role in type 1 diabetes (T1D) has been scarcely studied. We assessed the association between PE and preclinical atherosclerosis in T1D. METHODS: We recruited 112 women without cardiovascular disease and last pregnancy ≥5 years before: (1) T1D and previous PE (T1D+/PE+; n = 28); (2) T1D without preeclampsia (T1D+/PE-; n = 28); (3) previous PE without T1D (T1D-/PE+; n = 28); and (4) controls (without T1D or PE; T1D-/PE-; n = 28). Groups were matched by age, several CVRFs, and diabetes duration and retinopathy (in T1D participants). Carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) and the presence of plaque (IMT ≥ 1.5 mm) were assessed by standardized ultrasonography protocol. RESULTS: Mean age of the participants was 44.9 ± 7.8 years (14.3% hypertension and 21.4% active smokers). Groups including T1D (T1D+/PE+ and T1D+/PE-) more frequently presented hypertension and statin treatment (23.2% vs 5.4% and 37.5% vs 8.9%; respectively; P < 0.01), without differences in other CVRFs. Carotid plaques were observed in 20.5%. In multivariate models adjusted for age, CVRF, and statins, both T1D and PE showed a similar impact on the presence of plaque, with odds ratios (95% confidence interval), 5.45 (1.36-21.9) and 4.24 (1.04-17.3), respectively. Both entities showed an additive effect when combined, both in common carotid-IMT (T1D+/PE- or T1D-/PE+, β = 0.198; T1D+/PE+, β = 0.297) and in the presence of plaque (8.53 [1.07-68.2] and 28.1 [2.67-296.4], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Previous PE was independently associated with preclinical atherosclerosis in T1D. Further studies are needed to ascertain its usefulness for stratifying risk in T1D women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amor et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 1 diabetes and previous preeclampsia (n=112). Previous preeclampsia and type 1 diabetes vs. Controls without type 1 diabetes or preeclampsia was evaluated on Presence of carotid plaque (IMT ≥ 1.5 mm) (OR 28.1, 95% CI 2.67-296.4). The combination of previous preeclampsia and type 1 diabetes was associated with a markedly increased risk of preclinical carotid plaque (OR 28.1; 95% CI 2.67-296.4).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: