Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate the association between elevated cardiac troponin I and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients receiving reperfusion therapy.
Does elevated cardiac troponin I on admission predict poor short-term outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with reperfusion therapy?
Does elevated cardiac troponin I on admission predict poor short-term outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with reperfusion therapy?
Elevated cardiac troponin I on admission serves as an independent predictor of poor short-term outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving reperfusion therapy.
Elevated cTnI may identify higher-risk AIS patients after thrombolysis; leaves open whether troponin monitoring should inform management.
BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the association between elevated cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and clinical outcomes in AIS patients receiving reperfusion therapy. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of AIS patients treated with thrombolytics at Southern Illinois Healthcare and the University of Oklahoma (2017-2024). Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and radiographic data were collected. Elevation of cTnI was defined as levels above 0.028 ng/mL. For high sensitivity troponins, the cutoff was 15 ng/L for women and 20 ng/L for men. Outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), in-hospital mortality, and functional status at 30 days (good outcome defined as mRS ≤2). Overlap-weighted multivariable logistic regression was performed, adjusting for demographics, comorbidities, and stroke severity. RESULTS: > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, elevated cTnI on admission is an independent predictor of poor short-term outcomes in AIS patients treated with reperfusion therapy. Troponin measurement may provide important prognostic information, particularly in older patients and those with more severe strokes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Loggini et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: