Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cross-sectional survey reveals significant curriculum satisfaction and career intention disparities among undergraduate sports majors, indicating a need for tailored teacher training frameworks.
Research Purpose: This study aims to systematically examine the implementation status of Physical Education Teacher Education (PETE) curricula from the perspective of student satisfaction, with a focus on identifying systematic professional gaps. By dynamically linking students’ subjective experiences with curriculum quality, it seeks to provide a non-Western perspective for global PETE curriculum reforms. Research Methods: A mixed-methods design was employed, involving a cross-sectional survey of 842 undergraduate students majoring in Physical Education and Sports Training at universities in Guangdong Province. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire with validated reliability and validity, based on a six-dimensional satisfaction evaluation framework. Descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Pearson correlation analysis were used to reveal satisfaction disparities among different professional groups and identify key influencing factors. Research Results: Descriptive statistics showed moderate overall satisfaction (M=3.77, SD=1.034). ANOVA revealed significant between-major differences, with Physical Education majors reporting higher satisfaction in curriculum objectives, knowledge acquisition, and competency development (p<0.05). Chi-square test further demonstrated that Sports Training majors were 1.6 times lower willingness to pursue teaching careers intentions compared to Physical Education majors (χ²= 24.918, p=0.002). Pearson correlation analysis confirmed that knowledge acquisition (r=0.954) and competency development (r=0.886) were core drivers of overall satisfaction. Research Conclusions: This study highlights the need for differentiated PETE curriculum design aligned with career trajectories, as well as enhanced practical integration through longitudinal field experiences. It advocates for a competency-oriented and culturally responsive curriculum framework, emphasizing the incorporation of student feedback to ensure that the curricula is adapt to the needs of future teachers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: